Bitget vs BloFin: the United States numbers
Bitget publishes proof-of-reserves attestations. Full Bitget vs BloFin breakdown for United States, verified against official pages on July 11, 2026.
- Verified
- Jul 11, 2026
- Sources
- Official sources cited
- Market
- United States
Availability
Not available in United States
Sign-ups are not currently available from United States for the services reviewed here. The fee and terms research below stays available for comparison, but this page has no sign-up links.
On the numbers both platforms publish, Bitget takes this one for most United States users: the platform publishes proof-of-reserves attestations. That verdict is mechanical — lower published entry-tier cost and broader published coverage win rows, and ties stay ties. Every figure was re-checked against official pages on July 11, 2026, and the row-level sources are one click away below.
Bitget and its counterpart are lined up on the same published rows below — entry-tier costs, verification, coverage, and local availability — with the winning cell decided by the published number alone, re-checked on July 11, 2026. Where a platform does not publish a figure, the row says so instead of guessing, because an unpublished number is a real answer about transparency too. Use the availability row first if you are signing up from United States: a cheaper venue that cannot legally take your registration is not cheaper.
| Brand | Published value | Source | Availability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bitget | Futures maker fee: not published · Futures taker fee: not published | Bitget fee schedule | not available in United States | |
 BloFin | Futures maker fee: 0.02% · Futures taker fee: 0.06% | BloFin official website | not available in United States |
Each check below names the platform whose published number wins that row outright, using the values re-verified on July 11, 2026. Bitget and its rival keep their source links in the last row, so any cell can be audited in one click before you commit funds — and if a provider stops publishing a value, the row flips to "not published" on the next re-check rather than staying frozen.
| Check | Bitget | BloFin |
|---|---|---|
| Futures maker fee | not published | 0.02% |
| Futures taker fee | not published | 0.06% |
| KYC requirements | Yes — identity verification required before opening an account (ToS clause 5.3); no stated capabilities for unverified users | not published |
| Listed assets | 600+ spot tokens (futures: "over 590 coins") | not published |
| Proof of reserves | Monthly Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves; claims 100% of user assets held; open-source code on GitHub | not published |
| Founded | 2018 (corroborated by Wikipedia: "Bitget was founded in 2018.") | not published |
| Headquarters | Headquarters not publicly disclosed (Wikipedia infobox lists 'Unknown'); CEO Gracy Chen; serves worldwide | not published |
| Availability | not available in United States | not available in United States |
| Official source | Bitget fee schedule | BloFin official website |
- Which is better: Bitget or BloFin?
- For most United States users, Bitget — Bitget publishes proof-of-reserves attestations. If your priority is different (coverage, track record, verification rules), the table above shows exactly where each one wins.
- How does ChainCosts earn from this page?
- If you open an account through a link here, the provider may pay us a commission. It never changes the price you pay, and it has no input into which cell wins a row — the published numbers decide.
At a glance
Key facts
- Market
- United States
- Verified
- Jul 11, 2026
- Data completeness
- Only figures backed by the cited sources are shown; anything we could not verify is left out.
Not financial, tax, custody, or investment advice. Verify live terms with the provider before acting.
Route fit
Who should use this page
crypto provider screening where users need source-cited context before opening a partner link.
- Confirm the provider serves this market before creating an account.
- Check live fees, bonus terms, limits, and identity requirements on the provider site.
- Do not assume availability, pricing, or bonuses are identical across countries.
- Avoid depositing or submitting documents until provider terms match your own risk tolerance.
Machine-readable summary en-US / US
- Canonical source
- https://chaincosts.com/en-US/compare/bitget-vs-blofin
- What this page does
- comparison screening with visible partner-link disclosure
- Offers covered
- No active offers in this market
- Evidence
- 3 cited sources: Bitget fee schedule, BloFin official website, ChainCosts exchange fee checklist
- Partner links
- Partner actions go through go.chaincosts.com; source links stay direct.
- Not advice
- Informational only. Verify provider terms, eligibility, and fees before acting.
Alerts
Get fee and exchange alerts
A short digest when fees, bonuses, or exchange terms materially change.
- Fee, bonus, and access changes worth checking before signup.
- Market-aware updates when an offer becomes unavailable or less competitive.
- Email or Telegram only; one contact method is enough.