Binance vs Bitget: the United States numbers
Binance vs Bitget for United States: published fees, verification rules, and availability side by side, checked on July 11, 2026.
- Verified
- Jul 11, 2026
- Sources
- Official sources cited
- Market
- United States
Availability
Not available in United States
Sign-ups are not currently available from United States for the services reviewed here. The fee and terms research below stays available for comparison, but this page has no sign-up links.
The published numbers split this one: Binance has the longer track record (since 2017 vs 2018); Bitget publishes proof-of-reserves attestations. Neither side sweeps the table for United States, so the right pick depends on which row matters most to you. Every figure was re-checked against official pages on July 11, 2026, and the row-level sources are one click away below.
Binance and its counterpart are lined up on the same published rows below — entry-tier costs, verification, coverage, and local availability — with the winning cell decided by the published number alone, re-checked on July 11, 2026. Where a platform does not publish a figure, the row says so instead of guessing, because an unpublished number is a real answer about transparency too. Use the availability row first if you are signing up from United States: a cheaper venue that cannot legally take your registration is not cheaper.
| Brand | Published value | Source | Availability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Binance | Spot maker fee: 0.1% · Spot taker fee: 0.1% | Binance trading fees | not available in United States | |
 Bitget | Spot maker fee: not published · Spot taker fee: not published | Bitget fee schedule | not available in United States |
Each check below names the platform whose published number wins that row outright, using the values re-verified on July 11, 2026. Binance and its rival keep their source links in the last row, so any cell can be audited in one click before you commit funds — and if a provider stops publishing a value, the row flips to "not published" on the next re-check rather than staying frozen.
| Check | Binance | Bitget |
|---|---|---|
| Spot maker fee | 0.1% | not published |
| Spot taker fee | 0.1% | not published |
| KYC requirements | not published | Yes — identity verification required before opening an account (ToS clause 5.3); no stated capabilities for unverified users |
| Listed assets | not published | 600+ spot tokens (futures: "over 590 coins") |
| Proof of reserves | not published | Monthly Merkle-tree Proof of Reserves; claims 100% of user assets held; open-source code on GitHub |
| Founded | July 2017 | 2018 (corroborated by Wikipedia: "Bitget was founded in 2018.") |
| Headquarters | No official company headquarters (formerly China, Japan, Malta) | Headquarters not publicly disclosed (Wikipedia infobox lists 'Unknown'); CEO Gracy Chen; serves worldwide |
| Availability | not available in United States | not available in United States |
| Official source | Binance trading fees | Bitget fee schedule |
- Which is better: Binance or Bitget?
- The published numbers do not produce a single winner for United States; the table above shows which platform wins each row so you can weight what matters to you.
- How does ChainCosts earn from this page?
- If you open an account through a link here, the provider may pay us a commission. It never changes the price you pay, and it has no input into which cell wins a row — the published numbers decide.
At a glance
Key facts
- Market
- United States
- Verified
- Jul 11, 2026
- Data completeness
- Only figures backed by the cited sources are shown; anything we could not verify is left out.
Not financial, tax, custody, or investment advice. Verify live terms with the provider before acting.
Route fit
Who should use this page
crypto provider screening where users need source-cited context before opening a partner link.
- Confirm the provider serves this market before creating an account.
- Check live fees, bonus terms, limits, and identity requirements on the provider site.
- Do not assume availability, pricing, or bonuses are identical across countries.
- Avoid depositing or submitting documents until provider terms match your own risk tolerance.
Machine-readable summary en-US / US
- Canonical source
- https://chaincosts.com/en-US/compare/binance-vs-bitget
- What this page does
- comparison screening with visible partner-link disclosure
- Offers covered
- No active offers in this market
- Evidence
- 3 cited sources: Binance trading fees, Bitget fee schedule, ChainCosts exchange fee checklist
- Partner links
- Partner actions go through go.chaincosts.com; source links stay direct.
- Not advice
- Informational only. Verify provider terms, eligibility, and fees before acting.
Alerts
Get fee and exchange alerts
A short digest when fees, bonuses, or exchange terms materially change.
- Fee, bonus, and access changes worth checking before signup.
- Market-aware updates when an offer becomes unavailable or less competitive.
- Email or Telegram only; one contact method is enough.