MEXC vs BloFin: the Hong Kong numbers
MEXC charges less on futures takers (0.02% vs 0.06%). Full MEXC vs BloFin breakdown for Hong Kong, verified against official pages on July 11, 2026.
- Verified
- 11 Jul 2026
- Sources
- Official sources cited
- Market
- Hong Kong
Next step
Check the numbers, then open the provider in a new tab
Fees and terms can vary by region and account level. Compare the figures below, then verify the provider's own screen before depositing or submitting documents.
MEXCtrading bonus- Market
- en-HK / HK
- Page
- comparison
- Updated
- 11 Jul 2026
Referral terms vary by region and account state.
On the numbers both platforms publish, MEXC takes this one for most Hong Kong users: the platform charges less on futures takers (0.02% vs 0.06%). That verdict is mechanical — lower published entry-tier cost and broader published coverage win rows, and ties stay ties. Every figure was re-checked against official pages on July 11, 2026, and the row-level sources are one click away below.
MEXC and its counterpart are lined up on the same published rows below — entry-tier costs, verification, coverage, and local availability — with the winning cell decided by the published number alone, re-checked on July 11, 2026. Where a platform does not publish a figure, the row says so instead of guessing, because an unpublished number is a real answer about transparency too. Use the availability row first if you are signing up from Hong Kong: a cheaper venue that cannot legally take your registration is not cheaper.
| Brand | Published value | Source | Availability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEXC Top pick for Hong Kong | Spot maker fee: 0% · Spot taker fee: 0.05% | MEXC trading fees | accepts Hong Kong | Open account |
 BloFin | Spot maker fee: not published · Spot taker fee: not published | BloFin official website | accepts Hong Kong | Open account |
Each check below names the platform whose published number wins that row outright, using the values re-verified on July 11, 2026. MEXC and its rival keep their source links in the last row, so any cell can be audited in one click before you commit funds — and if a provider stops publishing a value, the row flips to "not published" on the next re-check rather than staying frozen.
| Check | MEXC | BloFin |
|---|---|---|
| Spot maker fee | 0% | not published |
| Spot taker fee | 0.05% | not published |
| Futures maker fee | 0% | 0.02% |
| Futures taker fee | 0.02% | 0.06% |
| Availability | accepts Hong Kong | accepts Hong Kong |
| Official source | MEXC trading fees | BloFin official website |
- Which is better: MEXC or BloFin?
- For most Hong Kong users, MEXC — MEXC charges less on futures takers (0.02% vs 0.06%). If your priority is different (coverage, track record, verification rules), the table above shows exactly where each one wins.
- How does ChainCosts earn from this page?
- If you open an account through a link here, the provider may pay us a commission. It never changes the price you pay, and it has no input into which cell wins a row — the published numbers decide.
At a glance
Key facts
- Market
- Hong Kong
- Verified
- 11 Jul 2026
- Data completeness
- Only figures backed by the cited sources are shown; anything we could not verify is left out.
ChainCosts may earn a commission if you sign up through a partner link on this page. This never changes the numbers we publish.
Not financial, tax, custody, or investment advice. Verify live terms with the provider before acting.
trading bonus
MEXC
- market
- Hong Kong
Referral terms vary by region and account state.
Open MEXCtrading bonus
BloFin
- market
- Hong Kong
Referral terms vary by region and account state.
Open BloFinRoute fit
Who should use this page
exchange signup and trading-bonus checks where regional access, fees, and account terms matter before registration.
- Confirm the provider serves this market before creating an account.
- Check live fees, bonus terms, limits, and identity requirements on the provider site.
- Use the partner link only when the destination still matches MEXC and the visible terms look acceptable.
- Do not assume availability, pricing, or bonuses are identical across countries.
- Avoid depositing or submitting documents until provider terms match your own risk tolerance.
- Remember that partner actions go through go.chaincosts.com; official source links remain direct.
Machine-readable summary en-HK / HK
- Canonical source
- https://chaincosts.com/en-HK/compare/mexc-vs-blofin
- What this page does
- comparison screening with visible partner-link disclosure
- Offers covered
- MEXC, BloFin
- Evidence
- 3 cited sources: MEXC trading fees, BloFin official website, ChainCosts exchange fee checklist
- Partner links
- Partner actions go through go.chaincosts.com; source links stay direct.
- Not advice
- Informational only. Verify provider terms, eligibility, and fees before acting.
Alerts
Get fee and exchange alerts
A short digest when fees, bonuses, or exchange terms materially change.
- Fee, bonus, and access changes worth checking before signup.
- Market-aware updates when an offer becomes unavailable or less competitive.
- Email or Telegram only; one contact method is enough.